There are two basic ways to think about the future – and many variations of combinations.
1. Extrapolate today’s trends out. That is what passes for most ‘futures’ gee whiz stuff in journalism. A trend has already begunn. Now, where does it go from here? It can be called ‘present-forward’ or trends, projections, etc.
2. Imagine a future and then figure out how it could happen. This is harder to do. Like imagine the U.S. as a hereditary monarchy and what would it take to get there. It can be called ‘future-back’ or alternative futures, etc.
This slide shows the idea of looking at what internal drivers could change the Army as an institution, what trends could make a difference, and what plausible alternative worlds need to be considered.
Half of my day job last year was working on a futures team for Integrated Air Space and Missile Defense for a corporate sector (about 18,000 employee organization). We used the same methodology with the two basic approaches to what technologies could be developed in what capabilities 15 years from now.
Leave a comment